Joint
Statement on Environmental Emergency Response for the Radiological Incident
described below
EXERCISE - EXERCISE - EXERCISE
Lead RSMCs:
Issued at (Date and Time (UTC)):
Note: This is a summary of the contents in a request form. Therefore, the fields
will be filled only if the corresponding information is provided in the request
form.
Name of the release site and country:
Latitude (decimal degrees N or S):
Longitude (decimal degrees E or W):
Height of the site (m):
Start of release (date/time, UTC):
Duration (hours): , or
End of release (date/time,
UTC):
Radionuclide species:
Total release quantity (Becquerel):
Pollutant
release rate (Becquerel/hour):
Effective height of release:
Surface:
Release height:
Base (m): 15
Top (m):
Request sent by:
Additional information
(Optional):
Contact Details for
Note: The
following table shows all RSMCs’ contacts. Please refer to the contacts
relevant RSMCs in your Region.
|
RSMC |
E-Mail |
Telephone No. |
|
RA I and VI |
|
|
|
Exeter, United Kingdom |
+44
330 135 4267 |
|
|
Toulouse, France |
+33 5 6107 8540 |
|
|
Offenbach, Germany |
+49 69 8062 2591 +49
69 8062 2530 |
|
|
Vienna, Austria |
+43
1 36026 2311 |
|
|
RA II |
|
|
|
Beijing, China |
+86
10 5899 3295 |
|
|
Tokyo, Japan |
+81 3 3434 9102 |
|
|
Obninsk,
Russian Federation |
+7
484 394 4950 |
|
|
RA III and IV |
|
|
|
Montreal,
Canada |
+1
514 421 4635 |
|
|
Washington,
USA |
+1
301 683 1500 |
|
|
RA V |
|
|
|
Melbourne, Australia |
+61
3 9669 4010 |
For more detailed
contact information, see https://wmo.int/contact-points-nuclear-and-non-nuclear-environmental-emergency-response.
Surface observations at the release site:
Surface weather and outlook:
Details regarding the models
of each RSMC, including the name of the NWP model, native horizontal
resolution, cycle run, and forecast time interval, can be found in Section 5,
Annex 4 at https://community.wmo.int/technical-document-no-778-documentation-rsmc-support-environmental-emergency-response-targeted.
Description and analysis of the concentration results (gathering the
information from the different results, describing the most likely outcome and
explaining the differences in the results), and some interpretation of these.
Exposures for both models are very
similar. The CA exposure pattern
extends further to the northeast into southwestern Russia, however. It also extends further south, reaching
Crete, contrary to the US model.
Maximum amounts are very similar between both models for the third day (8.77e+04
vs 7.6e+04 Bq*s/m3 for the CA and US models, respectively).
Description and analysis of the total
deposition results (gathering the information from the different results
and describing the most likely outcome), their differences and some
explanations on why the differences arise.
Deposition patterns are very similar between
both models, extending into southwestern Russia and northwestern Turkey. It is noted that the maximum amount of
deposition in the US model is two orders of magnitude larger than its CA
counterpart (4.9e+05 Bq/m2 vs. 3.4e+03 Bq/m2).
Some information on the expected flow with altitude
collected from the different trajectory results.
While the trajectories
forecast by both the US and CA models are initially alike, the US low-level
trajectories ultimately stay over Hungary and Serbia, contrary to the CA
trajectories, which make it to the western Black Sea. Conversely, while the US mid-level
trajectories end up almost over the Black Sea, the CA ones remain over
Romania. The upper-level trajectories
are more similar, making it to northwestern Turkey.
At a particular location, any model
dispersion/deposition differences can be attributed to differences in the flow
driving meteorological models and differences in the formulation of the
dispersion models. Until updated meteorological data and sufficient
radiological monitoring information become available, it is suggested that the
higher comparative values of the time-integrated concentrations and total
depositions presented above be considered.
Trajectories represent material released from discrete
levels. The limited number of trajectories displayed may be used to evaluate
the general material flow beginning at each level. Still, it should not be used to determine pollutant
time-integrated
concentration patterns or total deposition patterns, since these levels may not
be representative of all interacting levels where pollutants are being
transported, diffused and deposited. The concentration/deposition model results
and comparisons are a more appropriate guide for decision-making.
Concentration results represent the total air
concentration present in the area in the corresponding time interval, i.e. the time-integrated concentration over the first 24 hours, second 24 hours and third 24 hours.
Deposition is the process where material leaves the
atmosphere either by the uptake at the surface (dry deposition) or by the
absorption into droplets and the following precipitation (wet deposition). Wet
deposition is highly related to the forecast and may therefore lead to bigger
deviations in the results due to variations in forecasts of different
meteorological models. The results depict the total deposition (i.e. sum of dry
and wet deposition).
Details on the mandatory products and general rules for displaying
products can be found in Appendix 2.2.22 of the Manual on the WMO Integrated
Processing and Prediction System (WIPPS) at https://library.wmo.int/records/item/35703-manual-on-the-wmo-integrated-processing-and-prediction-system?offset=2.